How can a corporate innovate faster?
When it comes to corporate innovation, there is a lot of talk, but few are willing to share a practical playbook for achieving their goals.
Some companies are trying to break the trap of sustainable innovation, only to find that the processes that enable them to become market leaders make truly disruptive innovation impossible. One way in which companies can come out of the jam is to create an innovation team for businesses, directed solely toward corporate innovation.
Like any other major innovation program, creating a team that is able to translate the best innovation ideas within an organization into independent startups has many advantages. For others, it makes more sense to bring in a more experienced corporate innovation tool with a long history of successful corporate innovation in other industries, such as venture capital or private equity.
For some, it is only a matter of time before they become what I like to call an “innovative team”
Whether you choose a closed or open model or mix things up, there is a good chance that you will follow a different model of innovation than the one you had begun with. Such models are implemented by those who have considerable experience with different innovation models and are not afraid to innovate even better.
Corporate innovation doesn’t have to be sexy, but it does need to grow and yield returns. No matter how you do it: corporate innovation helps your company to win now and in the future. Corporate innovation leads to results, not only in terms of sales, profits, and earnings per employee but also profits as a share price.
If you seriously believe that innovation is necessary to keep your business relevant, then your organization needs to be better at it. Defining an innovation strategy also means defining how much innovation you need and expect and how to get it out. In addition to a clear understanding of why innovation must be significant, what innovation means for the company, how to implement it, improving the innovation capacity of the organization requires changes and changes in management.
Now, the path you take for corporate innovation will differ, and how your company answers these questions may differ. First, you should familiarize yourself with open innovation and closed innovation strategies. As the name suggests, an open corporate strategy looks for ideas from the outside, while a closed corporate strategy looks for suggestions for improvement from within the company itself.
If a company is serious about building an innovation engine, it must improve everyone’s innovation capabilities, agree on what counts as innovation, set comprehensive metrics, hold leaders accountable for innovation, and reorganize its management processes to process it. Nothing shows a commitment to growth and innovation than to take someone who has taken a good path in his/her career and give them the chance to innovate.
Don’t get me wrong, many companies benefit absolutely from having a chief innovation officer, but calling it something doesn’t make any difference. Executives need to consider where the company stands in its innovation cycle, and underpin it with services that make a difference, such as a new product, business model, or technology. When a company is in this phase, it lacks an innovation culture and is aware of the need for innovation.
The innovation skills that the company imparts to its employees are not able to keep up with its specific definition of innovation by selecting innovation indicators and integrating them into a performance management system. Of course, companies’ innovation programs need to adapt and evolve to integrate new business models, new technologies, and new management systems, as needed.
If you want to scale the intrapreneurship and just get an MVP experiment underway How do you know which one is right for your business? This is the challenge many corporates are facing.
That said, the corporate innovation’s CTO must understand and feed his innovation teams the creativity to try & error numerous ideas and work on the hypothesis of new innovative devices. A CTO is very well needed for a company’s innovation, however, the management style of the CTO will have a great impact on the development speed, quality, and success of new devices.
Finding the right partner to help corporate innovation teams figure out the suitability of a new innovative product, they’ll need to dedicate a lot of resources toward, not only market research but also the development of the said researched product.
This is why internal corporate innovation can begin to stagnate. The issue that numerous corporate innovation teams will face is internal processes. The process model that many corporations uses are designed to ensure quality and safety is safeguarded throughout the development process. However, innovation needs flexibility, and with so many restrictions, corporates will find themselves with a constantly increasing lead time and a restriction on creativity.
So, finding the right partner can be the most favorable response to this challenge. The appeal to corporate innovation teams are toward decreased lead time, or at least, a drastic decrease in the development process.
Consider that over 90% of corporate innovation products don’t reach the market, for a wide range of reasons, imagine how much time/money is poured into developing a product that will never enter the market?
A case study between SVV and Client X can be used as a good example of the benefits of outsourcing innovative product development. Client X is a European company, working on a new IoT device.
Client X’s innovation team predicted a three-year product development cycle, from prototype to MP1. After connecting with SVV the development cycle was reduced to seven months! Almost 77% faster than if Client X had kept the process internal.
To sustain innovation beyond a single idea, companies must define roles and allocate resources to sustain the growth and innovation process, and define the role of each. CEO, executive, and management agree that innovation must go beyond breakthrough products to include completely new ways to create and deliver value.
To successfully implement innovation, you need to know exactly what constitutes an innovative organization and how it contributes to its growth.
When you think about how innovation reflects the brand in a broader sense, you can see the values that underlie innovation and the reasons for innovation. A look at the motivation behind the entrepreneurial innovation strategy and the formulation of the desired results is the first step to applying strategic theory to the efforts to innovate. The concentration and dissemination of the broader theory of what brand strategy is can help clarify the purpose of innovation in the early days of a business innovation strategy.
It’s an interesting time for corporate innovation, especially during this 2020 pandemic, as the world’s economy is slowly shrinking month after month, it doesn’t look good for startups to continue being the disruptors of innovation.
But instead, the burden lays on the corporate’s shoulders, as people look toward trusted brands and industry experts to offer new products/devices that consumers can fundamentally trust. In this day and age startups are the rule-breakers, the disrupters, the companies that corporate innovation teams looked toward for creativity and innovation. But that dynamic has changed.
In the future, it’s clear that corporates will be the leader of innovation, with the chance to take inspiration from startup companies, perhaps even acquire good ideas, and polish them off through their industry partners.
Who knows if this model will shift back to startup companies. But, in the foreseeable future, people will be looking toward corporations to offer new innovative solutions, rather than start companies themselves.
It seems an opportunity can arise for startup teams and corporate innovation teams, as this bridges a new path toward closer relations between disruptors and corporates. If there can be a platform designed to create an open boundary for startups and corporates to communicate, then this would be the most prosperous means of future innovation.
To sum up, the whole idea that corporate innovation was founded upon was to expand their markets and beat their competitors in their market segments. But the tides have somewhat changed, or evolved, in the eyes of corporate innovation teams, as the world now looks toward the real internal strength of a corporation’s internal structure.
If their structural integrity stays intact while churning out new devices/products, through hard times like the 2020’s COVID pandemic, then they will grow far beyond their segmented markets and be seen as a truly innovative corporate.
Take a read through our articles
In one of our previous posts, we mentioned how product development can be an extremely tedious process that requires a lot of iterations and redesigning. It is for this very reason why DVT manufacturing is a crucial step during your product development life cycle…
The manufacturing process selection and DFM process can be very daunting, especially if this is your first time manufacturing…
Corporate technology is constantly evolving and in order to stay competitive on the market, they will need to find the perfect balance between hardware and software…
CHINA: Building 4, Level 9/10 Tianan Yungu Industrial Park, Longgang, Shenzhen USA: 955 Alma St, Palo Alto CA 94301, California
GERMANY: Eckstein: Albert-Einstein-Ring 1/F1,14532 Kleinmachnow (Berlin)
Copyright © 2021 Shenzhen Valley Ventures. All rights reserved.